ANNA KARENINA (Joe Wright, 2012)
ANNA
KARENINA begins in 1847 imperial Russia with Anna (Keira Knightley),
wife of government official Count Alexei Karenin (Jude Law), traveling
from St. Petersburg to Moscow to comfort her sister-in-law Dolly (Kelly
Macdonald) for the infidelity of her brother, Prince Stepan “Stiva”
Oblonsky (Matthew Macfadyen). While Anna pleads with Dolly to forgive
Stiva, something she suggests her relative must do to regain her own
happiness as much as anything, the promise of unspoiled love eases the
tension in the home. Dolly’s 18-year-old sister Princess Ekaterina
(Alicia Vikander), otherwise known as Kitty, has two suitors. In
anticipation of rich cavalry officer Count Alexei Vronsky (Aaron
Taylor-Johnson) asking for her hand to be his wife, Kitty declines the
proposal of Stiva’s friend Konstantin Levin (Domhnall Gleeson).
The
prospect of Kitty and Vronsky marrying is dashed when he and Anna
unexpectedly connect with an animal magnetism that shocks and thrills
her. Although the scandalous affair taints Anna in society’s view and
threatens to destroy her, with Vronsky she finds the passion that has
been lacking in her relationship with Karenin. In response, her husband
approaches Anna’s relationship with Vronsky as if it is a policy
matter. Karenin shares his perspective and a clear set of consequences
if she is to continue it.
Director
Joe Wright’s entry to the film world came with his fresh cinematic
treatment of PRIDE & PREJUDICE. The Jane Austen novel seemed as
though it had been adapted to death by the time of Wright’s version, but
he lent immediacy to the period piece with modern touches and
filmmaking verve. ANNA KARENINA is another giant of the literary world
that would seem to invite a staid, classical style, yet once again the
director’s bold vision shakes up what might have otherwise been a fusty
filming of the canon.
In
their version of ANNA KARENINA Wright and screenwriter Tom Stoppard
deliver an audacious adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s classic of Russian
literature. Much of the realist fiction’s action--everything set in
cities--is transposed to the artificial confines of a theater. Scenery
and costume changes occur on camera in elaborately choreographed
transitions. Characters wander into the wings, the auditorium, and
above the stage. With nothing incapable of being put on view, the
visual strategy makes plain the hypocrisy between the public and private
as well as the male and female. It also pokes fun at urban progress,
such as the lengthy tracking shot punctuated with the delivery of an
ashtray.
Yet
for all of the flashy staging indebted to Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger,
gorgeous cinematography, and sumptuous production design, ANNA KARENINA
relies on small, human gestures to convey the depth of feeling and
judgment. Emotional expression tends to be clipped and indirect, with
much being communicated through glances and the subtlest of movements.
Paced
like a surging locomotive, ANNA KARENINA plays like the ultimate
CliffsNotes, which is both testament to Stoppard’s exceptional
adaptation and abridgement of Tolstoy’s novel and acknowledgment of the
film’s somewhat superficial center. Anna’s choice to sacrifice
everything for Vronsky merits more inspection but is shortchanged for
the sake of expediency. Even with portions rendered in shorthand, ANNA
KARENINA is a stylistic triumph in its exploration of the collisions
between love and passion, the rational and irrational, and the moral and
sinful.
Grade: B+
No comments:
Post a Comment