PROMISED LAND (Gus Van Sant, 2012)
Steve
Butler (Matt Damon) knows firsthand how small towns can be ravaged in a
down economy. Born and raised in Iowa, he saw how the closure of a
Caterpillar plant devastated the community. Unlike many of those he
grew up with, Steve got out and is enjoying success as a representative
for a global natural gas company. He travels to rural areas to persuade
property owners to sell drilling rights on their land. Steve isn’t
ignorant of the risks involved with hydraulic fracturing, otherwise
known as fracking, but he is convinced that what he does improves the
lives of the struggling folks he encounters. Any charity Steve feels
for them doesn’t interfere with his knack for securing contracts for the
lowest price possible, though.
In
PROMISED LAND Steve and co-worker Sue Thomason (Frances McDormand)
expect a short stay for their assignment to close deals in a small
Pennsylvania town, but gaining local approval is complicated when
science teacher Frank Yates (Hal Holbrook) raises objections during a
town hall meeting and the citizens postpone a vote on the matter for
three weeks. Then Dustin Noble (John Krasinski), an environmental
activist from Nebraska, rolls into Miller Falls warning everyone that
fracking can lead to dead livestock, land that can no longer be farmed,
and contaminated ground water. His message quickly gains traction and
raises the pressure on Steve and Sue to deliver.
The
makers of PROMISED LAND clearly object to fracking but attempt, not
always successfully, to explore the issue without stacking the deck in
favor of its viewpoint. Steve counters critics with the contention that
natural gas is a clean, domestically plentiful alternative to coal and
oil. Even if one doesn’t fully buy his argument, rejecting natural gas
means implicitly accepting dirty energy sources and relying on overseas
suppliers. Fracking will bring an influx of money to the area and may
restore a place and population that is economically disadvantaged. In
the end the situation boils down to which risks are the ones worth
taking.
Damon
and Krasinski, who co-wrote the screenplay, and director Gus Van Sant
approach PROMISED LAND like a Frank Capra film. The American people and
process are trusted to arrive at the right decision, even if opposing
forces are working to manipulate them. The townsfolk are credibly
portrayed as being aware of what’s at stake, if not fully informed, and
susceptible to the lure of easy, much-needed money. Steve and Dustin
are on different sides but generally seem sincere in their efforts.
PROMISED
LAND is at its best when showcasing the details of life in a
self-contained agricultural community and the strategies and
affectations Steve, Sue, and Dustin employ to influence the people
there. For all of his good intentions, Steve is something of a
huckster. Damon plays him with genuine charm and strong
compartmentalizing abilities. Krasinski displays his everyman appeal as
his character effortlessly ingratiates himself with the locals. The
film’s middle section amuses with the maneuvering and passive-aggressive
interactions between Steve and Dustin.
PROMISED
LAND is well-acted and observed, although two flaws emerge. Steve and
Sue are more flustered by the presence of a single environmentalist than
a couple of old pros should be. PROMISED LAND tends to be savvy about
risks and rewards, but one turn of events is unearned. The development
doesn’t ruin the film but wipes out the balance it was striving for.
Grade: B
No comments:
Post a Comment